Litigation » Delaware Chancery Court Rules in Favor of Hedge Fund in Software Appraisal

Delaware Chancery Court Rules in Favor of Hedge Fund in Software Appraisal

August 23, 2024

Delaware Chancery Court Rules in Favor of Hedge Fund in Software Appraisal

The Delaware Chancery Court ruled for a petitioning hedge fund in appraisal litigation stemming from the acquisition of Pivotal Software, Inc. by controlling shareholder VMware, Inc., as the McCarter & English firm reported.

The Delaware Chancery Court corrected its March 2024 decision setting Pivotal’s fair value due to a “squeeze-out merger” that some shareholders alleged undervalued the business and created a buyer windfall at their expense. 

Pivotal, a software and services company, was created through a spin-off of assets held by VMware and EMC Corporation. Dell Technologies, Inc., controlled by Michael Dell, beneficially owned more than 94% of the voting power of both Pivotal’s outstanding common stock classes.

Since Dell also held a controlling interest in VMware, he controlled both the acquirer (VMware) and the target (Pivotal). Pivotal followed procedures intended to be consistent with MFW protections, including establishing a special committee of independent directors to review the transaction.

After negotiating, VMware agreed to pay $15.00 per share, or about $2.7 billion, to acquire Pivotal.

HBK Master Fund LP and associates, holding about 10 million Pivotal shares, argued that $15.00 per share was undervalued.

The petitioner HBK claimed a fair value of $20.00 per share based on a comparable company’s analysis. The court made two adjustments to HBK’s analysis, yielding a value of $14.75 per share.

The respondent argued that the fair value was $12.17 per share based on a discounted cash flow analysis. The court made adjustments to the analysis, resulting in a value of $16.13 per share. The court then averaged the $14.75 and $16.13 per share values to arrive at a $15.44 fair value in the corrected opinion, a 44-cent per share gain for the petitioner.

According to the article, a bigger takeaway from the decision “may be the court’s determination that the appraisal statute does not require deference to the deal price in controller squeeze-outs conditioned on MFW protections.”

Sign up for our weekly newsletters specifically curated to different practice areas: litigation, cybersecurity & data privacy, legal ops, and compliance.

Critical intelligence for general counsel

Stay on top of the latest news, solutions and best practices by reading Daily Updates from Today's General Counsel.

Daily Updates

Sign up for our free daily newsletter for the latest news and business legal developments.

Scroll to Top