Another round of Ericsson v. Apple

July 21, 2022

Legal Fight

A Colombian court has ruled that Apple’s 5G-equipped iPhones and iPads infringe on a patent owned by Ericsson, and banned them from sale and import. The patent at issue is valid until 2037. Apple’s appeal is hampered by a judge’s decision that it cannot seek or enforce an “antisuit injunction” from a foreign country that can prevent or restrict the enforcement of the preliminary injunction. Instead Apple is attempting to win antisuit damages in the Eastern District of Texas. Its motion claims that the Colombian injunction gives Ericsson “economic and logistical leverage” to pressure Apple into abandoning litigation and paying Ericsson royalties. It asks Chief Judge Rodney S. Gilstrap to rule that Ericsson must “indemnify Apple from any fines, fees, penalties, and costs it incurs as a result of the Colombian injunction.” The motion technically does not seek an antisuit injunction. It seeks an antisuit damages claim, which wouldn’t run afoul of the Colombian court’s limitations.

Critical intelligence for general counsel

Stay on top of the latest news, solutions and best practices by reading Daily Updates from Today's General Counsel.

Daily Updates

Sign up for our free daily newsletter for the latest news and business legal developments.

Scroll to Top